Skip to content
    Outline · Appendix

    Updated: 12 August 2026 at 00:00

    Strategizing, Self-Actualization, and Visionary Leadership

    mid

    A practical MBA module on strategic narratives, resource-based thinking, long-range scenarios, macro risks, and a leader's personal trajectory.

    Primary source

    MBA module: strategizing and self-actualization

    A post series on strategic thinking, personal trajectory, and macro risk context.

    Open post [1/3]

    #Management

    This chapter synthesizes an MBA module into a practical leadership lens: company strategy, personal strategy, and self-actualization. The focus is execution-ready thinking, not abstract theory.

    TL;DR

    • Strategy starts with worldview assumptions and the narrative you currently operate from.
    • Organizations benefit from combining Porterian and resource-based logic, not polarizing them.
    • Personal 5/10-year planning needs both rational goals and emotional sustainability.

    Module structure

    1) Worldview and narratives

    • Kick-off through abstract paintings: emotion, interpretation, and naming.
    • Erik Erikson's basic trust scale: from 'the world is dangerous' to 'the world is safe'.
    • Gestalt loop (need -> pre-contact -> contact -> post-contact) as a frame for unfinished situations.

    2) Company strategy and personal strategy

    • Value proposition is checked across key stakeholders: shareholders, clients, employees, society.
    • Personal equivalent: manager, direct reports, peers, family.
    • Two strategic logics are combined: top-down (Porter) and bottom-up (Barney's resource-based view).

    3) 5/10-year horizon and external context

    • Personal 2x2 exercise: two major challenges, extreme alternatives, scenarios for 5 and 10 years.
    • Success depends on both rational and emotional dimensions.
    • Macro frame: governance levels, PESTLE, global risks, and preparedness for higher-level scenarios.

    Two strategic lenses

    Porterian strategy (top-down)

    Context: Often more natural with a 'safe world' perception where planning and forecasting are trusted.

    Core: Logic from market structure to strategy: market scope + competitive advantage type.

    Typical moves: Differentiation, cost leadership, focus.

    Resource-based view by Barney (bottom-up)

    Context: Often attractive with a 'dangerous world' perception where internal capabilities are the anchor.

    Core: Logic from resources to advantage, then to market choice, strategy, and execution.

    Typical moves: Building on unique capabilities and escaping direct red-ocean competition.

    5/10-year personal strategy exercise

    1. Define 2 major challenges for a 5-10 year horizon.
    2. For each challenge, define two extreme alternatives and build a 2x2 matrix.
    3. Map three states: now, in 5 years, in 10 years.
    4. Choose your desired 10-year point and intermediate 5-year position.
    5. Describe the chain of events and decisions needed to move from current to target quadrant.
    6. Validate not only rationally but emotionally: will this trajectory be sustainable for you as a person.

    Quick meeting check-in trio

    • Body state (basal ganglia): energy, tension, and available capacity.
    • Emotional state (limbic system): what you actually feel now.
    • Intentional state (cortex): what outcome you are intentionally trying to create in this meeting.

    Patterns

    Include all strategic stakeholders, not just customers and PnL.

    Combine top-down and bottom-up strategy instead of choosing a single ideology.

    Evaluate major decisions through both rational and emotional filters.

    Revisit your personal narrative regularly: who you are, where you came from, where and why you are going.

    Keep external risk awareness active (for example through global risk reports).

    Common anti-patterns

    Treating strategy as slides without links to real resources and constraints.

    Ignoring emotional cost of your chosen path and burning out on a formally successful trajectory.

    Rationalizing unfinished emotional loops instead of resolving them.

    Confusing influence levels: trying to 'control' geopolitics instead of preparing your local scenarios.

    Using trendy terms without practical steps and validation checkpoints.

    External context: governance levels and risks

    Geopolitical

    Sovereign/social

    Corporate

    Personal

    Practical takeaway: for levels above your direct control, strategy is about readiness and scenario design, not illusionary control.

    Sources and related chapters

    Progress tracking is off. Turn it on in settings.

    Learning evidence

    Reading is only the start. Move the idea into a real workplace experiment and reflection.